Firestone Destination XT VS BFGoodrich KO2
The Firestone Destination XT and BFGoodrich KO2 are all-terrain tires and can play with any terrain in any weather.
The destination xt’s aggressive symmetric pattern and interlocking sipes provide more stability and traction on On/Off road terrains, but the ice traction is challenging.
While the Baja champion BFG ko2 delivers great traction and confident handling on all terrains, with its cut-chip and tear-resistant tread compound.
Both tires are 3PMSF severe snow rated, that’s why snowy terrain is not challenging for both of them, but which performs better. Let’s find out.
Specifications Comparison Table
| Specifications | Firestone Destination XT Specs | BF Goodrich KO2 Specs |
| Brand | Firestone | BF Goodrich |
| Tire Sizes | 30+ | 90+ |
| Mileage Warranty | 50000 | 50000 |
| Tire Size Inspected | LT 295/60rR20 | LT 295/60rR20 |
| Max Load | 3750 LBS | 3750 LBS |
| PSI Range | 80 PSI | 80 PSI |
| Tread Depth | 16/32 | 15/32 |
| Tire Weight | 56 LBS | 65 LBS |
| Rim Width Range | 8 – 10″ | 8 – 10″ |
| Section Width | 11.8” | 11.8” |
| Overall Diameter | 33.9″ | 33.9″ |
| 3PMSF Rated | YES | YES |
Check your required Firestone Destination XT tire size specifications on TireRack. Also, check your required BFGoodrich ALL-Terrain T/A KO2 tire size specifications on TireRack.
You can read the complete Firestone Destination XT Review to know more about destination xt’s performance on different terrains.
Pros & Cons Comparison
In the above specs comparison table, we find the only difference in tread depth and tire weight between destination xt and bfg ko2, and all other discussed specs are the same.
So, let’s see whether they are also the same in terms of pros and cons.
Firestone Destination XT Pros & Cons
- Defensible traction and grip on wet and dry terrains.
- Acceptable braking and acceleration on deep snow pavements.
- Great hauling and towing experience.
- Exceptional off-road traction and durability.
- Ice traction is not satisfactory.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 Pros & Cons Pros
- Excellent off-road traction and stability.
- Stable cornering with cutting-chip and rugged sidewalls.
- Great performance on wet and snowy terrains.
- Need improvement in noise reduction.
BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A Ko2 Vs Firestone Destination X/T Differences
The destination xt and bfg ko2 are both US-made and all-terrain tires. In the above destination xt and bfg ko2 specs comparison table, we can’t find any noticeable difference, but let’s find their performance difference on different terrains in detail.
Tread Pattern Difference
The Firestone destination xt is the perfect pick for 3/4 and 1 ton pickup trucks, jeeps, and body on frame SUVs to drive confidently in all seasons.
The destination xt has an aggressive symmetric tread pattern built with a specially formulated rubber compound.
The 3 ribs on the centered tread containing “F” and “S” shaped lugs (initials of FireStone) collectively increase the traction and durability.
It provides great traction with the help of interlocking 3d sipes on the center tread section. The high void ratios, deep tread depth, and open shoulders help to avoid hydroplaning.
The destination xt has a rigid internal structure with 2-ply polyester cords holding up with 2 steel belt construction to make it stiffer for better highway speed.
The champion of Baja BFGoodrich ALL-Terrain T/A KO2 is built with combative high void and interlocking C-shaped tread blocks with a little zig-zag pattern to provide exceptional off-road handling and go-anywhere traction, stability, and durability.
Tread Pattern
The serrated upper shoulder lugs with rugged sidewall lugs help in water evacuation and provide traction in deep mud and rock climbing with the help of 3D sipes and biting edges.
The BFG KO2, armed with CoreGard technology, assists to avoid sidewall failures and bruise-resistant of sidewall rubber.
The internal structure of BFGoodrich ko2 is equipped with twin steel belts with spirally wrapped nylon support and 3-ply polyester cords sidewall construction.
Dry Road Traction And Performance
The Firestone destination xt delivers exceptional on-road traction and handling with the help of comprehensive interlocking 3D sipes.
The longitudinal grooves and higher balanced shoulder lugs with less void space provide better stability while driving on a highway and a great hauling and towing experience.
While on the other hand, BFGoodrich KO 2 has longer but lower grooves and more void space in the tread pattern, although it provides adequate on-road traction and stability but is still behind the destination xt’s dry road performance.
The Firestone Destination XT is the Champion.
Cornering Stability Comparison
The cornering stability depends on strong sidewalls, and tires with strong sidewalls will be the winner in cornering stability. The destination XT provides sustainable cornering with 2 ply polyester sidewalls with 2 steel belts, but it can’t beat BFG KO2 in cornering stability.
Because the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is built with CoreGard technology, 3 ply polyester cords with spirally wrapped nylon support, and 2 steel belts, So it provides excellent cornering stability and grip.
The BFG KO2 is winner.
Steering Response Difference
As discussed above, the destination xt has less void space, higher grooves, and shoulder lugs, which help to make contact with the ground and provide a good steering response.
On the other hand, the BFG KO2 has lower grooves with more void space, cause loosing road contact that compromises the grasp and steering response.
So, the winner is Destination XT.
Wet and Slippery Road Performance
Wet performance depends on more water evacuation ability and ductile sipes. The destination xt performs very well on wet and slippery terrains with 3D sipes, less void space, and a flexible rubber shield.
It provides exceptional wet traction and avoids slipping, and offers good braking distance.
But the BFGoodrich KO2 is behind the destination xt in wet and rainy traction and handling, although it delivers justifiable wet traction but can’t beat the destination xt in wet comparison.
The Destination XT is the champion.
Off Road Performance
Off-road performance is the test case for all-terrain tires. The off-road traction and stability is not a big deal for BFG KO2. It delivers exceptional performance on dirt, sand, gravel, rock, and muddy trails.
Dirt and Mud Terrain(MT) Traction
The Dirt performance is not a big challenge for all terrain tires, both destination xt and bfg ko2 provide great traction on dirty terrains.
The tire with bulkier sidewalls, staggered shoulders, and extra void spaces to evacuate mud will perform well on muddy trails.
In this comparison bfg ko2 is the tire that is built with 3 ply strong sidewalls with bulkier side lugs and staggered shoulders which helps instant mud evacuation.
How’s their Sand Performance?
A tire with more tread voids and lightweight will provide good sand traction.
The bfg ko2 is more aggressive and bulkier than destination xt as the maximum tire weight is 61 lbs in destination xt tire sizes.
While the destination xt has less void spaces than the bfg ko2, its thicker rubber help in sand contact and avoids digging.
So, both perform well and provide acceptable traction on sandy terrains. Thus this section is tied.
How’s their Rock and Gravel Performance?
You need a tire with biting edges and strong sidewalls internally and externally to get maximum gravel and rock traction.
The BFGoodrich delivers excellent rock and gravel traction with various bitting edges on a centered interlock tread pattern and 3 ply nylon supported strong sidewalls.
It also performs well in rock climbing compared to destination xt, although destination xt will not let you down in the gravel and rocky terrain.
So, the BFG KO2 is winner.
How’s Their Winter And Snow Traction?
Both tires are 3 peak mountain snowflake (3PMSF) rated, and both performed well on snowy terrain.
But ice is the challenging part for both of them, especially for bfg ko2, the destination xt performs well on ice and provides acceptable braking distance.
So, if you regularly drive on severe winter and snowy terrains, you should go for winter tires for exceptional winter performance.
Road Noise Comparison
A tire with more void space will be noisy compared to a tire with less void space and a closed tread pattern.
The BF Goodrich KO2 has an open tread pattern with longer tread blocks and more void space, making it noisier than the Firestone X/T.
The Firestone X/T has less void space and a closed tread pattern, so its noise cancellation is great.
The winner is Firestone Destination X/T.
Ride Comfort Comparison
Driving comfort depends on the internal construction of the tire. As discussed, the destination xt is constructed with 2 ply polyester cords and 2 steel belts.
In contrast, the bfg ko2 is constructed with 3 ply polyester cords with nylon support and twin steel belts.
For that reason, the bfg ko2 is slightly more comfortable to ride than the destination xt.
So, the BFG KO2 is the Campion of ride comfort.
Durability Comparison
Tire compound and strong sidewall construction are key factors in durability. We know enough about destination xt and bfg ko2, and can easily decide who is more durable in this section.
Yes, you get it right, the BFG KO2 is more durable than the destination xt, as it features strong sidewalls with CoreGard technology. The destination xt is slightly less durable as compared to BFG KO2.
The winner of this section is BF Goodrich KO2.
Warranty
Both destination xt and bfg ko2 offer satisfactory tread life warranty to provide purchasing satisfaction to the product users.
| Warranty | Firestone Destination XT Warranty | BF Goodrich KO2 Warranty |
| Treadwear | 5 Years / 50,000 Miles Half mileage for rear if different size than front | 6 Years / 50,000 Miles |
| Uniformity | First 2/32″ of wear | 1 Year / first 2/32″ of wear |
| Manufacturer Special Warranty | 90 Day Buy & Try Guarantee (1) | 60 Day Satisfaction Guarantee (1) |
| Manufacturer’s Road Hazard | None | None |
| Read full Warranty Details | Check out on TireRack | Check out on TireRack |
Price
The tire price depends on numerous factors like size, category, etc. So, mentioning the exact price is useless.
However, I personally analyzed and found the BFG KO2 more expensive than Firestone Destination XT.
You can see the current prices of both tires on the following links as per your required tire.
See the latest prices of Firestone Destination XT on TireRack.
You can also see the latest prices of BFG KO2 on TireRack.
Final Thoughts
Both tires perform very well and provide excellent traction in winter with a 3PMSF rating. In comparison, the destination xt delivers more wet traction.
The off-road traction winner is BFG KO2 with its aggressive tread, shoulder lugs, and strong sidewalls.
We discussed the on-road and off-road performance of both tires in the Firestone destination xt vs bfg ko2 comparison.
So, choosing a tire for your vehicle may depend on numerous factors, like your driving taste, usage, and road and weather conditions.
Well, I will go with Firestone Destination XT.
